Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Published 11 June 2021

New fire safety guidance a retrograde step for schools

NFCC Logo image

The Department for Education is currently consulting on proposed revisions to its fire safety guidance for schools in England. Last year, the NFCC, alongside partners in the built environment called for the installation of sprinklers in schools, including the retrofitting of sprinklers in existing school buildings when relevant refurbishment takes place.

However, this new guidance falls well short of that and will only require sprinklers in schools over 11m. The original guidance, when first released in 2007, acknowledged the important role of sprinklers and stated that “all new schools should have fire sprinklers installed except in a few low-risk schools”.

In addition to falling short on sprinklers, this new guidance still allows for the use of combustible materials on external walls.

NFCC Sprinkler Lead, Jonathan Dyson said:

“These new sprinkler proposals are immensely disappointing and, if implemented, represent a missed opportunity to make our schools safer.

“As the original guidance sets out, sprinkler systems can significantly reduce the degree of damage caused by fire and can reduce the risk to life, which is why it is even more puzzling as to why the Department for Education are intent on watering down the current guidance in England.

“At the moment there is a loophole which means that the number of new schools being built with sprinklers has reduced from 70% in 2007 to around 15%.

“We have called for the installation of sprinklers in schools, including the retrofitting of sprinklers in existing school buildings when relevant refurbishment takes place. We believe this is in line with the policy intent of the original guidance and that the evidence supports such a move.

“School fires can be devastating and the use of sprinklers are proven to not only minimise the disruption to a pupil’s education, but also the impact on their family, the community and the wider education establishment. Schools are important community assets that need protecting.

“Whilst there are proposals in this consultation that we would support, we are calling on the Government to think again on sprinklers and work with us to make our schools safer.”

Notes

The NFCC has proposed that all schools undergoing refurbishment/extension are fitted with an appropriate Automatic Fire Suppression Systems (AFSS), with AFSS being mandatory in all new schools (NFCC’s response to the consultation on BB100 Design for Fire Safety in schools can be found here). The use of alternative design guidance such as BS9999 and BS7974, should only be permitted where AFSS are to be installed, and alternative solutions based on cost reduction should not be permitted. Our position statement on AFSS can be located here.